This would be a major medical procedure - surgery ...

2010-03-22T07:47:03.998-04:00

This would be a major medical procedure - surgery - which would require the consent of all parties. I'm sure infertile women would be all for it, regardless of the risks. But a woman who finds the "fetus" an intrusion and a violation would have to be forced to go through the procedure. Even as pro-life as I am, I do not think we should make people have surgery. We should just make them have the baby which is less risky than surgery to both parties involved.

What might happen instead is that technology develops that enables us to save younger and younger pre-term babies. Well, such technology won't develop under Obamacare, but under a free market system, such technology would be developed because parenst want it. We now save babies that are 22 weeks old - fabulous! What if we could save babies that are 18 weeks or 15 weeks...that could be used to offer another "choice" for women who don't want babies. They could opt to have a c-section at 15 weeks and have their unborn child "adopted" by a couple who wanted it.

Comments on Kristina's Soapbox: Pro-Choice could be Pro-Life

This would be a major medical procedure - surgery ...